The chairman of the Bar Council has written to the Ministry of Justice to say that without a ‘dual commitment’ to index-linked increases in the new fees for advocates and regular reviews barristers would have ‘no-confidence’ in proposed reforms.

As reported in LegalVoice here, the Bar gave their qualified support to the plans in the MoJ’s consultation to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme. 

In a separate letter to the MoJ, Andrew Langdon QC takes exception to the MoJ’s lack of collaboration with the profession on the issue of costs neutrality. The silk pointed out that 2014/2015 was the year that costs would be fixed.’However, subsequent to the collaborative working process and, without our knowledge or involvement, the ministry chose to calculate what the subsequent year 2015/2016 would have cost if the new scheme had been in force. The answer apparently is the new scheme would have cost three per cent less.’

According to Langdon, the ‘unforeseen and unintended outcome’ was ‘unfortunate and a failure to absorb this outcome and to reflect it in the size of the envelope against which cost neutrality is sought, will run contrary to the spirit of all our work,’ he said.

‘Cost neutrality is not an appropriate way of addressing the future of advocacy in the Crown Court,’ Langdon wrote. ‘The present AGFS is underfunded having suffered a succession of significant cuts over many years. The cuts are bigger than in any comparable field of remuneration by public funds. There are serious consequences of underfunding… . We have repeatedly set them all out for you.’

• About the Author
• Latest Posts

About Jon Robins

Jon is a journalist and has written about the law and justice for the national papers and specialist press for more than 15 years. Jon is a visiting journalism lecturer at Winchester University, a visiting senior fellow in access to justice at the University of Lincoln and patron of Hackney Community Law Centre. He has won the Bar Council’s legal reporter of the year award twice (2015 and 2005). Jon is editor and co-founder of LegalVoice

• JusticeWatch: #legalaidmatters - 14th July 2017
• Emergency payouts to Grenfell victims will not affect legal aid eligibility - 14th July 2017
• Flexible court plans ‘disastrous for diversity’, says Bar Council - 12th July 2017
• JusticeWatch: ‘We need somebody we can trust’ - 7th July 2017
• Greater Manchester Law Centre calls on local firms to ‘put their hands in their pockets’ - 7th July 2017
• #LALY17: ‘I love that we get to go from the food bank to the Supreme Court’ - 6th July 2017
• Number of firms and advice agencies undertaking civil legal aid has collapsed by a third post-LASPO - 4th July 2017
• No engagement by prosecution with defence lawyers in nine out of 10 magistrates’ court case, say inspectors - 30th June 2017
• Chancery Lane warns of increasing legal aid ‘deserts’ as a third of country has inadequate housing advice cover - 29th June 2017
• ‘It’s not a matter of “do we have an inquiry or do we have an inquest” – you have both’ - 28th June 2017