Chancery Lane has attacked plans for price-competitive tendering for housing possession court duty schemes as ‘a race to the bottom’ whilst welcoming clarity for the tender for 2018 civil legal aid contracts.
Duty scheme contracts will be allocated on the basis of one per court but, for the first time, this will be done on the basis of price competition.
According to the Legal Aid Agency: ‘Ministers are currently considering plans to revise the approach for the delivery of housing possession court duty schemes (HPCDS) contracts. It is proposed that contracts would be procured via a competition which includes an element of both price and quality and providers would be required to deliver services across all courts in larger scheme areas, thus increasing the size of most contracts. The approach will be informed by the policy consultation. We additionally propose to amend the rules for claiming for HPCDS work so that organisations can claim an HPCDS fee even where the case progresses to a full legal help matter.’
‘We see considerable problems in price-competitive tendering – the cheapest offering will not necessarily be the best. This could result in a race to the bottom which may impact on professional standards,’ commented Law Society president Robert Bourns. ‘A price war will not improve services and could negatively impact on clients.’
‘The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) needs to set out what steps it will take to mitigate this risk,’ Bourns said. ‘It should also keep in mind that cuts in payment only compound years of cuts for the solicitors that look after the interests of our most vulnerable citizens. It may mean that contracts which are already at best only marginally economically viable for firms become unsustainable.’
Chancery Lane noted that ‘in the bulk of cases’ contracts would be awarded to those firms that match the LAA’s stipulated standards ‘and this is something we can welcome as it helps underpin quality’.
You can read more about the LAA’s plans here.
- Government is ‘failing’ victims of trafficking by denying legal aid - 13th October 2017
- JusticeWatch: Is it time to axe the LAA? - 13th October 2017
- A cross-party group MPs call for LASPO review as ’a matter of urgency’ - 13th October 2017
- JusticeWatch: LASPO review ‘a bit like waiting for Godot’ - 6th October 2017
- LAA more interested in ‘refusing aid’ than access to justice, say LAPG - 6th October 2017
- JusticeWatch: Something’s got to give - 29th September 2017
- Bach Commission: ‘Justice is far too precious to be a party political football’ - 27th September 2017
- JusticeWatch: ‘A justice system in crisis’ - 22nd September 2017
- Bach Commission calls for ‘legally enforceable’ right to justice and for eligibility to legal aid to cover half of all households - 22nd September 2017
- ‘I don’t think we’ve listened enough,’ says head of courts - 20th September 2017